Home > News > Panda @ AV-Comparatives

Panda @ AV-Comparatives

January 26th, 2010 Pedro Bustamante

After some years we have decided to participate again in the AV-Comparatives.org tests.

The main driver for this decision has been the evolution of the methodologies employed by AV-Comparatives. We are happy to see that cloud-scanning components of products are also tested and this of course is important for testing Panda products as they incorporate not only signature-based cloud-scanning but also cloud-heuristics.

We will participate in all the main tests of AV-Comparatives (On-Demand, Retrospective, False Positive, Malware Removal, etc.) as well as the new Whole-Product Test which is a very promising test which replicates user experience.

However AV-Comparative’s Retrospective Test (which consists of freezing a 2-week old signature and testing against new malware to see how good the heuristic engine is) still does not use cloud-heuristics which are present in Panda products. Even though this methodology will penalize Panda’s products to some degree, we believe it is important to be present in the rest of the tests performed by AV-Comparatives.

Categories: News Tags: , , ,
  1. January 26th, 2010 at 16:37 | #1

    Great! :)

  2. January 27th, 2010 at 02:08 | #2

    OK, I’ll wait the test result..
    nice decisions

  3. January 27th, 2010 at 02:10 | #3

    glad to see that new vendor join the test..
    so we can compare more antivirus product..
    thank you

  4. skokospa
    January 27th, 2010 at 23:45 | #4

    Finally ….. show them in the right light….
    We believe that “good conduct” in these tests!!

  5. January 28th, 2010 at 11:43 | #5

    What AV of yours will AV-Comparatives be testing? Will they test Panda Cloud AV?

  6. Cloudman
    January 28th, 2010 at 13:30 | #6

    I do not really get the cloud systems. What about removable media when you are not in the net ? Thare is no heuristics and product does not have latest signatures.

    I really prefere AV with heuristics on the machine.

  7. buddee
    January 29th, 2010 at 16:07 | #7

    gr8 news . ……waiting 4 the results…

  8. Pedro Bustamante
    January 29th, 2010 at 22:04 | #8

    @Icedrake Normally AV-Comparatives uses the regular Antivirus and Internet Security suites for their comparatives. For consistency’s sake we’ll use the same ones (Panda Antivirus Pro 2010 & Panda Internet Security 2010).

    @Cloudman Actually there are heuristics and other non-cloud technologies to protect while offline. Also the cloud concept is to have the latest most important signatures synchronized every time you connect to the Internet. Some more reading about this can be found here:
    http://research.pandasecurity.com/arguments-against-cloud-based-antivirus/

  9. el cineista
    January 30th, 2010 at 02:17 | #9

    My english isnt’ really good but i try to explain my problem. I need to know how uninstall the Panda USB Vaccine from the computer definitly, All of my cd-roms not function and i need the autorun of that cds , i try unistall the program of my computer but the autorun of any removable still non function. Iam desperado. Thanks to any one to resolve them. Really..

  10. Pedro Bustamante
    February 3rd, 2010 at 17:25 | #10

    @el cineista Actually Panda USB Vaccine does NOT modify the behaviour the the CD/DVD “autoplay” function. Only the “autorun” of programs is disabled. To uninstall it, simply open it and click on “remove vaccination” from the computer. But like I said, it should not have anything to do with the “autoplay” feature of CD/DVDs.

  11. March 2nd, 2010 at 11:59 | #11

    Checked out the site, see Panda isn’t listed yet, any idea when it’ll be tested

  12. buddee
    March 4th, 2010 at 15:20 | #12

    check out the weblog section there they have mentioned the panda as new candidate. just waiting for panda results

  13. buddee
    March 20th, 2010 at 16:03 | #13

    results has been published, good to read that panda got 99.2% of on demand scanniing and rated 3rd on detection, hope to see panda on 1st with less false postive

  14. skokospa
    March 20th, 2010 at 23:05 | #14

    why there is a lot of false alarms?almost 50 false alarms?

  15. Pedro Bustamante
    March 20th, 2010 at 23:50 | #15

    I wouldn’t worry much about the false positives. This is the first time we participate in AVC in many years. It has taken the other vendors some time to get adjusted to the false positive testbed as well. As with the other vendors, I’m sure in the next test we will be more adjusted to these false positives as well and perform much better in this respect.

  16. buddee
    March 21st, 2010 at 08:07 | #16

    pedro 1 suggestion , truprevent should block a file which tries to hide a folder and make executeable with the same name becoz now a days mostly malware use this behaviour. thx

  17. Pedro Bustamante
    March 21st, 2010 at 23:17 | #17

    @buddee Thanks buddee. If you have some samples which behave like this, please send them to me and we will see if we can add this to TPs intelligence.

  18. buddee
    March 22nd, 2010 at 03:44 | #18

    pedro i have already submitted those samples through PIS2010 and they are now deteced as trj/CI. if you need them again plz give me ur email so i can send you there.

  19. matin
    April 27th, 2010 at 18:41 | #19

    Ineed antivirus goodbye

Comments are closed.